Law Zina contradictions in the Bible

Zina according to the Dictionary of English is the congress which is not done by the husband and wife, according to the Dictionary of Islam adultery means sex between men and women outside marriage; act of prostitution or whore, and according to the Encyclopedia Bible Time Now adultery means sexual intercourse that is not recognized by the community.

Zina is an unscrupulous act, munkar and the result is very bad for the actors and the community, so that God's servants reminded that any act of adultery:

And do not approach adultery; indeed adultery is an act of indecency. And a bad way. QS. 17:32

He also provides a way to avoid the act of adultery with a fast, to keep the views and the veil for women, and God also gave extraordinary threat to the perpetrator to adultery servants afraid to make adultery:

The adulterous women and men of adultery, then deralah each one of them one hundred times chastisement. QS. 24:2

So, when Islamic law started, the result is fantastic, fornication and unscrupulous really very minimal and residents into the community better. Amatilah carefully and objectively since the dawn of government to this moment, when the Islamic law applied in full, then ancha public good.

But when we apply the law adultery in the Bible, it appears that there is a contradiction between the hard punishment and not punished.

Theorem 1: Jesus forbids adultery

He said Do not adultery, which quoted from in-ten (10) the command of God in the law precisely Exodus 20:14, and Jesus also gives his warning not to commit adultery:

But I say unto you: Each of the women and want, commit adultery with her already in his heart. But if the eyes of the right to lead you, cungkillah and remove it, because it is better for you if one member of the body perish from the body's de-intact want to hell. Matthew 5:28-29

Warning of Jesus provides meaning that how strong the effect of prohibiting the very act of adultery, one of the women and attracted by the Jesus is said to commit adultery in the heart, and according to some Bible commentary, to commit adultery is the same nature with adultery.

Still according to the word of Jesus, that pick and discard the eye is far better than our eyes cause we consider that women and to commit adultery, because the eye is one of the entrance to the evil mind. Poke the eye is symbolic that we consider to prevent women who can throw all of our body to hell.

I think Jesus is warning Likewise with the warning in the Al-Qur? An order that we do not commit adultery, but Al-Qur?'s More realistic so that people do not fall into fornication, God warns do not approach women for adultery and ordered auratnya close, so the eyes of men not to take misguided, must be recognized that many sexual crimes from the eyes, either to see women dressed in sexy and minimal or view pornographic VCDs.

Proposition 2: Jesus Leaving Pezina

When scribes and the Pharisees came to Jesus to submit to a woman who caught wet commit adultery:

"Rabi, this woman when he caught a wet se-dang commit adultery. John 8:4

He urged them to continue to punish women according to the law, namely dilempari stone to death, but Jesus rejected the request and said to them:

"Whoever among you is not guilty, he would just throw the first stone to the woman. John 8:7

hear the word of Jesus, the one-by-one they began to leave Jesus and the prostitute, because they feel no one is not guilty. Then leaves both Jesus and it pezina women, and Jesus said to him:

"O woman, where would they? One that does not punish you? "Replied:" No, God. "Then Jesus said:" I do not condemn you. Go, and do not sin again from now. "John 8:10

Attitude Jesus did not implement appropriate punishment law, the birth big question mark, because Jesus never said their own:

"Easier to the heavens and the earth disappeared from the one point from the previous law. Matthew 5:17

and the law are:

Deuteronomy 17:5

Whether Jesus is not consistent with its own apology? is not possible, or because they feel Jesus himself as the guilty so that he does not want to punish the woman? also may not, because this means that Jesus has accused sin (according to the faith KristenYesus holy man is without sin), if all it is not possible, and which may be? whether the story was false? may be, but while we consider the original story.

Proposition 3: Jesus tandem with Pezina

When Jesus sat at the edge of a pit from the exhausting journey, and the students go to the city to buy food. Approximately twelve o'clock came the day a woman to take the water in the wells, and Jesus said to him:

"Give me a drink." So the Samaritan woman said to him: "You Cuisine, a Jew, ask a drink to me, a Samaritan?" John 4:7,9

pembicaraanpun continues long enough between Jesus and women who are not accompanied by the students, their only two wells in the population far from home. And ternnyata woman is a prostitute who has five (5) who are husband and a relationship with a man who is not her husband:

Her words: "I do not have a husband." Jesus said: "Right katamu, that you do not have a husband, because you have had five husbands and is now on, not the husband. In this case you say BEnA. John 4:17-18

Of course, women are very sexually attractive, because these women have up to five (5) people in my husband was able to interweave love with another man who was not her husband. Then the big question is, like Jesus, both with a pair of women pezina? And whether Jesus may not look that women are chat with? Of course, IT-dak may be, because Jesus had said:

But I say unto you: Each of the women and want, commit adultery with her already in his heart. But if the eyes of the right to lead you, cungkillah and remove it. Matthew 5:28-29

Is Jesus sabdanya will forget? certainly not possible, or Jesus is not consistent with sabdanya? is not possible, or Jesus does not want to keep the eyes? not possible.

Theorem 4: Jesus Diciumi feet by Pezina

A Pharisee invited Jesus to come eat at home. Jesus came to the home of the Pharisees, and sat eating. Luke 7:36

Then came a famous female prostitutes, full of sin from the city to meet Jesus with a marble jar that contains perfume, a weeping woman bersimpuh near Jesus, and Jesus' feet wet with water and wipe her eyes with her hair, and the smell of the feet Jesus and meminyakinya with oil under, and Jesus said to Simon who invites:

"You see this woman? I go to your house, but you do not give me water to wash kakiKu, but he was wet with tears kakiKu and menyekanya with hair. You do not kiss me, but since I entered it no stopping kiss kakiKu. You do not grease my head with oil, grease, but he kakiKu with perfume. Therefore I say unto you: Everyone has forgiven a lot, because he has a lot of love. But few people are forgiven, he was also a little love. Luke 7:44-47

The big question appears, like Jesus would diciumi his feet by a prostitute, diseka legs with hair prostitutes and diminyaki hair by a prostitute, as evidence of repentance from the sins of the prostitutes act of adultery?

This is far more dangerous than the just look, if Jesus may no interest in women when diciumi legs? Say no, why give the example of Jesus is that? Can the students watch or do the same origin does not inflame? Could this story as a story that has never experienced by Jesus, in other words, the story is the story false? according to my opinion, the story is very contradictory to the teachings of Jesus that prohibits women looked especially diciumi feet.

Al-Book How To act of adultery?

Theorem 1, Jesus teaches that someone avoid the act of adultery, even in a symbolic poke the eyes of Jesus and ordered it when the eyes are interested in the cause of a woman and the desire to do so, that many sexual crimes from the eyes. Islam provides a solution that is more beautiful:

Say to the men who believe: "Let them hold views, and maintaining chastity; that is more sacred to them, surely Allah knows what they do." QS. 24:30

Then God gave instructions, so we have the facilities to avoid the pan-dangan who invited sexual desire:

O Prophet, say to the wife-wife, children, women and wives of people mu'min: "Let them pass all jilbabnya to their bodies." That is so much easier for them known, and they will not be disturbed. And Allah is Forgiving, Merciful. QS. 33:59

Proposition 2, the second argument of Jesus let someone who caught wet commit adultery, which should be Jesus chastise according to the law, because Jesus and his subject under the law, but Jesus bomb with a reason that no one has the right to menghukuminya, because that can menghukumi a pezinah who is not guilty. Of course, this attitude provides the opportunity for a very wide pezina to commit adultery, because no one can menghukumi pezina unless the person is not guilty. And there are no people who are not guilty.

Proposition 3, the proposition is to provide an example that Jesus is not very good, namely, both of a pair with a female prostitute, when Jesus was said to look not only to be done and must poke the eyes, and if two-pair if possible not to look? It may not, especially women, was a prostitute who is digandrungi by men, her husband of five and he has another man who was not her husband. I find that people have a shunt from adultery:

? So do not be a male tandem with a woman who is not with mahramnya, because the third is Syetan? HR. Tirmidzi and Ahmad

Theorem 4, Jesus again provide an example that is not good, namely to let a prostitute kiss his feet and let her hair diminyaki by these women. Of course, the act of Jesus is precisely to build more intimacy than the eyes.
From 4 to postulate, the teachings of the Bible may not be able to overcome the moral disintegration because the act of adultery, suggests both need a good example and penalties to prevent it.

Reference:
1. Prayer Gospel of Matthew? Publisher Kanisius
2. Prayer Bible New Testament? Institutions Biblical Indonesia - Publisher Kanisius
3. Bible interpretation Time Now? Yayasan Bina Kasih Publisher / OMF
4. Bible encyclopaedia Time Now? Yayasan Bina Kasih Publisher / OMF